Bookmark and Share
Sponsored by:
Do you say "I Love You" to your cat?
Always
Sometimes
Never


Da Bird Insect Wand Cat Toy Style: Butterfly
Regular Price: $5.99
Bookmark and Share

Huntington Beach, Calif., City Council To Vote on Mandatory Spay, Neuter Ordinance

The proposed legislation would require cat and dog owners to alter and microchip their pets.

The Huntington Beach, Calif., City Council is scheduled to vote Monday, Nov. 5, on whether to adopt an ordinance that would require pet owners to microchip and spay or neuter their cats and dogs.

If it passes, the ordinance would be the first in the state to require altering and microchipping for both cats and dogs. Exemptions would apply if certain criteria were met.

The goals of the ordinance are to reduce uncontrolled breeding, to more humanely manage the city’s pet population and to reduce the strain on Orange County Animal Care Services’ resources, according to a staff report prepared by Huntington Beach Police Chief Kenneth W. Small and presented to the council in September.

After hearing the report and community input, the council voted 4-3 in favor of drafting the ordinance.

Pet owners may apply for an exemption if a veterinarian deems the surgery unsafe, the animal is used for law enforcement purposes, the animal is a service animal or the pet is deemed a competition animal.

As a result of public concerns, two changes were made to the proposed ordinance since it was presented to the council in September. Pet owners who don’t qualify for an exemption, but wish to keep their pets intact, could do so if they paid an “unaltered animal fee.”  If this provision passes, the fee would be established at a future council meeting. The second change reduces the age required for mandatory altering from 6 month to 4 months.

Opponents of the ordinance say it would create a “nanny government” and infringes on individuals’ rights. Those in favor of the ordinance say it would reduce the number of animals euthanized.

A high turnout is expected at the council meeting from those speaking both for and against the legislation.

If the council votes in favor of the ordinance, it must go through a second reading and a second vote before it can be adopted. Typically, ordinances receive a second reading at the next regularly scheduled council meeting, which is Nov. 19. If adopted, the ordinance would go into effect after 30 days, but it would not be enforced until Dec. 1, 2008 due to a one-year grace period.

Posted: November 3 2007 2 a.m. EDT

 Give us your opinion on
Huntington Beach, Calif., City Council To Vote on Mandatory Spay, Neuter Ordinance
Submit a Comment
Reader Comments
Great!
Mary, Rockford, IL
Posted: 11/3/2007 10:35:58 AM
This type of ordinance has a serious flaw. No exemption is made for hobby breeders, who usually have ten animals or less. Nor is there any way to comply with the ordinance by becoming a "licensed" breeder, because no one has defined what it takes to become licensed. Where this type of ordinance has already passed, the effect has been to drive hobby breeders underground, or out of the area altogether. The proponents of such ordinances seem to believe that breeding purebred cats is wrong, because they believe that the very existence of a purebred cat condemns a stray cat to death. This is a flawed argument, because there would still be stray and feral cats, even if no purebred cats even existed! There will continue to be strays and ferals, as long as some people continue to treat cats as disposable pets. I feel that I have as much right to own a purebred cat of my choosing, as I do to have children of my own, instead of adopting. Why should the majority of law-abiding citizens be punished for the actions of the criminal few? That's what this type of ordinance does. It takes away your right to own a purebred cat or dog, instead of some poor mixed-breed stray. There is a better way to handle the cat overpopulation problem. Make more low-cost spay/neuter clinics available, and implement the trap-neuter-return (TNR) approach for ferals. Stop punishing the many for the crimes of the few!
Linda, Suisun City, CA
Posted: 11/3/2007 3:09:50 AM
This ordinance certainly is an interesting idea. I have never heard of any local law like this. The article stated that it would be the first city in California to adopt such legislation. It raises the question, which it did not answer, of whether there is someplace outside of that state that has passed similar measures. I can certainly see the benefit to the community, but it makes the cost of having a cat greater, possibly reducing the number of people who can afford to adopt a cat.
Richard, Miami, FL
Posted: 11/3/2007 2:41:12 AM
View Current Comments

Name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:

Cats USA
Buy Now
Kittens USA
Buy Now
Cat Fancy
Buy Now
 



Sponsored by:


Hi my name's Angel Moe,This honor is wonderful thank you to all

Visit the Photo Gallery to
cast your vote!