California Spay/Neuter Bill Fails in Senate

Measure requiring cat and dog sterilization is under reconsideration.

June 3, 2009 3:00 a.m. EDT

Printer Friendly

Pet spay/neuter bill reconsidered
An amended version of California Senate Bill would require cats and dogs to be sterilized at 6 months of age.
The California State Senate on Monday rejected SB 250, a measure that seeks to require pet sterilization for most of the state’s cats and dogs, with a vote of 16-15. It needed 21 votes to pass.

A “Reconsideration” vote took place on Tuesday, June 2, but the vote has not yet been announced.

SB 250, by Senate Majority Leader Dean Florez, calls on cat owners to spay or neuter their cats at 6 months of age if the cats are allowed to roam at large. The bill also requires the sterilization of all dogs at 6 months of age, unless the owner gets an unaltered dog license.

The amended bill authorizes local governments to use existing procedures to issue the intact dog licenses or to charge a fee for procedures related to the issuance, denial or revocation of unaltered dog licenses. In addition, unaltered dogs used in legal hunting activities would be exempt from being cited. The sterilization of dogs found to be at-large continues to be a requirement under the bill.

SB 250 is backed by various humane societies and by Social Compassion in Legislation, which says the bill would reduce euthanasia rates and save taxpayer dollars.

The American Kennel Club sent out an alert Tuesday stating that continued opposition of the bill is needed. AKC is asking fanciers, responsible breeders and concerned dog owners to contact Senate members and encourage them to either abstain or vote no on the measure.

Printer Friendly

 Give us your opinion on
California Spay/Neuter Bill Fails in Senate

Submit a Comment   Join Club
Earn 1,000 points! What's this?
Reader Comments

blank    blank, TN

6/14/2009 7:59:40 AM

I think it's for the best, the government shouldn't control things like reproduction. I think these people should stop pushing for mandatory altering, and instead strive to eliminate puppy mills. I suggest that a bill be approved for a breeder's license on any registered, purebred animal that is being bred for profit, or to sell puppies/kittens ect. That way, the animal's papers can state that the animal's onwer hasn't been approved as a breeder or whatever.Instead of requiring your typical, basic owner to have their pet altered, focus on eliminating dog fighting, pet mills and the like. They contribute to a lot of the homeless popultaion if you think about it. Shelters could also do more to encourage and promote owner's rehoming their own pets. They could do a lot better.

Pat    Omaha, NE

6/4/2009 6:13:07 AM

Oh, that picture makes me sad!

Lori    Apple Valley, MN

6/3/2009 10:56:40 AM

I would think that the people in California would support this bill considering all the animals that have no where to call home.

Sandra    Corydon, IN

6/3/2009 10:37:08 AM

People should spay and neuter.

View Current Comments


Top Products

ADS BY GOOGLE