Bookmark and Share
Sponsored by:
Do you say "I Love You" to your cat?
Always
Sometimes
Never


Da Bird Insect Wand Cat Toy Style: Butterfly
Regular Price: $5.99
Printer Friendly Bookmark and Share

San Francisco Recommends Ban on Feline Declawing

The city would adopt the language of an anti-declaw ordinance that passed in West Hollywood in 2003.

Posted: July 22, 2009, 3 a.m. EDT

British Shorthair
The San Francisco ordinance would make declawing illegal except for therapeutic purposes such as removal of infected or injured tissue.
The San Francisco Commission of Animal Control and Welfare, the animal welfare advisory board to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, voted 5-1 earlier this month in favor of a city ban on feline declawing for nontherapeutic reasons.

Commissioner Philip Gerrie recommended that San Francisco adopt the language of an anti-declaw ordinance passed in West Hollywood in 2003. The West Hollywood measure, the first of its kind in the United States, makes it illegal to perform declawing within city limits, except for therapeutic purposes such as removal of infected or injured tissue.

Declawing, which involves amputating all or part of the last bone and connecting tendons and ligaments on a feline’s paw, can result in lameness and other physical problems, said Jennifer Conrad, DVM, director of The Paw Project, which sponsored the West Hollywood ordinance.

The California Veterinary Medical Association is opposed to such bans, arguing that the practice of veterinary medicine should be left to veterinarians.

The association filed suit against West Hollywood to overturn the law in 2005, stating that the city’s ordinance was unlawful, invalid and unenforceable because it conflicted with state law. However, in a 2-1 ruling in June 2007, the Court of Appeal upheld the anti-declaw ordinance. The San Francisco City Attorney’s office filed legal arguments in support of West Hollywood.

The CVMA continued by sponsoring SB 762, legislation to ensure statewide uniformity of standards for medical professionals. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed the bill on July 2, which prevents local jurisdictions from passing bans on medical procedures, such as declawing cats. The law takes effect on Jan. 1, 2010. Any bans passed before that time would stand, including the San Francisco measure.

 Give us your opinion on
San Francisco Recommends Ban on Feline Declawing
Submit a Comment
Reader Comments
As a veterinary technician, I have seen many declaw procedures. Every pet owner who wants to declaw should have to watch the surgery first, and witness the 2 days of "recovery" time, where the cats cannot stand or walk due to pain and the paws are wrapped in bandages that must be changed often because of the immense amounts of blood. This would let the owner make a truly informed decision.
Jan, San Francisco, CA
Posted: 9/12/2009 1:47:35 PM
I've had several cats over the past couple decades and I had each of them declawed when they were adopted. They have all had long and happy lives as strictly indoor cats. They were all pampered, cared for, and loved very much -- and lived long comfortable healthy lives with nothing but the best of care. I strongly RESENT the comment by jmuhj of Glendale that "anyone who would declaw a cat should not HAVE a cat." Your ignorance is astounding! You have NO business judging who should be allowed to adopt a cat. There is NOTHING wrong with having a cat declawed by a competent and licensed veterinarian. If you want your cats to keep their claws, fine; that's your choice. But don't preach to me or anyone else about how we should care for our cats.
tmrs, Denver, CO
Posted: 8/19/2009 11:54:19 PM
I don't understand why people would want to declaw their cats knowing now what problems it can cause. They say that 70% of all declawed cats will heal normal but will have some behavioral changes. The other 30% is not so lucky have there paws permanently scarred. It still baffles my mind that people don't understand that they are taking away a bone and not just a nail. I am glad for San Francisco, I hope this will show people how bad declawing really is.
JamieLyn, Howell, NJ
Posted: 7/28/2009 8:30:11 AM
Anyone who would declaw a cat should not HAVE a cat. With all the excellent scratchers, cat furniture, SoftPaws claw protectors, and claw trimmers out there, there is NO excuse to maim a cat for life and make him or her suffer physically and psychologically. Declawing is the equivalent of chopping off every one of your fingers at the first joint. Wouldn't do that to yourself? Don't do it to cats!!! Declawing is an atrocity that should be illegal and a felony.
jmuhj, Glendale, CA
Posted: 7/23/2009 1:58:35 PM
View Current Comments

Name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:

Cat Fancy
Buy Now
Cats USA
Buy Now
Kittens USA
Buy Now
 



Sponsored by:


Hi my name's Angel Moe,This honor is wonderful thank you to all

Visit the Photo Gallery to
cast your vote!