Bookmark and Share
Your E-mail:
Get the latest news, tips and
free advice every month
Cast Your Vote
Where does your cat sleep at night?


"North American Pet Classy Kitty Deluxe Cat Tree With Two Story Condo (19"" L X 22"" W X 65"" H; Brown)"
Regular Price: $229.99
Sale Price: $181.49
Printer Friendly

California Intact Animal Cap Bill Heads to Senate

The new law would make it a misdemeanor to own more than 50 breeding cats and dogs.

Posted: August 19, 2009 3:00 a.m. EDT

Puppy and kitten
A California bill limiting the number of breeding cats and dogs a person could own was passed by the Senate Appropriations Committee and will be voted on by the full Senate.
California Assembly Bill 241, which would limit the number of intact (unsterilized) dogs and cats any person could own for breeding and selling as pets, passed the Senate Appropriations Committee on Aug. 17. It will now be voted on by the full Senate, although a hearing date has not yet been announced.

The bill would make it a misdemeanor for any person to have more than a combined total of 50 adult unsterilized dogs and cats for breeding or raising them for sale as pets, as specified. Those who possess too many would have to spay or neuter the excess animals or sell, transfer or relinquish the animals within 30 days. If necessary, any euthanasia would have to be performed by a licensed veterinarian or other qualified person.

AB 241 authorizes a peace officer, humane officer or animal control officer to take possession of any animal kept in violation.

The Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council issued an alert last week stating that this “anti-pet bill” does nothing to advance animal welfare. Instead, “it will limit the availability of healthy well-socialized pet puppies from reputable breeders. Because the number of dogs permitted under this bill is completely arbitrary, proponents are advocating for the lowest limit they believe will be adopted in law. Next year, they can come back and seek to limit it further.”

PIJAC argues that there is no correlation between the size of a breeding facility and the quality of care provided to the animals. According to the organization, the only way to ensure humane care of animals is to establish and enforce reasonable standards under which breeders may keep them.

 Give us your opinion on
California Intact Animal Cap Bill Heads to Senate

Submit a Comment   Join Club
Earn 1,000 points! What's this?
Reader Comments
Sounds like a good idea to me. I think this is a MUCH better idea than a strict "no breeding" law.
blank, blank, TN
Posted: 8/23/2009 4:13:03 PM
I don't know why people would want to keep an excessive number of animals intact. There is such an overpopulation of animals in this country and many breeders that can't get rid of puppies end up using them to breed. There are so many animals getting terminated everyday in shelters, there should be some sort of law prohibiting the number of animals that are intact.
JamieLyn, Howell, NM
Posted: 8/20/2009 8:13:28 AM
I think that this is a good idea. Although I do not know much about breeding. Hopefully, it will help breeders to be more responsible.
Kate, Freeport, IL
Posted: 8/20/2009 6:52:21 AM
I think this should be considered but only on an individual basis. I have conflicting feelings.
Kim, Natrona Heights, PA
Posted: 8/20/2009 5:53:13 AM
View Current Comments

Name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:

Cat Fancy
Buy Now
Cats USA
Buy Now
Kittens USA
Buy Now
Become a fan of CatChannel on Facebook Follow CatChannel on Twitter
Get social and connect with CatChannel.



Hi my name's Peyton - Thank You For My COTD Honour!

Visit the Photo Gallery to
cast your vote!