Bookmark and Share
Sponsored by:
Do you say "I Love You" to your cat?
Always
Sometimes
Never


Breakaway Toys Catnip-Treated Mice (2 pk.)
Regular Price: $6.99
Printer Friendly Bookmark and Share

California Intact Animal Cap Bill Gets Second Reading With Amendments

Business entities now included in the proposed limits for cat and dog ownership.

Posted: August 26, 2009 3:00 a.m. EDT

Kitten and Puppy
A proposed California law would make it a misdemeanor for a person or business to own more than 50 breeding cats and dogs.
California Assembly Bill 241, which would limit the number of intact dogs and cats any person could own for breeding and selling as pets, was amended on the Senate floor on Aug. 24 and is now on its second reading.

The bill previously indicated that it would be a misdemeanor for any person to have more than a combined total of 50 adult (4 months or older) unsterilized cats and dogs for breeding or raising for sale as pets. The amended bill includes business entities.

The amended bill reads: “No person or business entity, as defined, shall own, possess, control or otherwise have charge or custody of more than a combined total of 50 adult unsterilized dogs and cats, in the state, at any time used for the purpose of breeding or raising dogs or cats for sale as pets.”

“Business entity” is defined as any company, firm, association, partnership, business trust, corporation, limited liability company or other legal entity.

This does not apply to public animal control agencies, shelters, rescue groups, veterinary facilities and research facilities.

In addition, the amended bill would make it a misdemeanor to act in concert with another person or to voluntarily assist a business entity in violating these provisions.

Those who possess too many dogs or cats would have to spay or neuter the excess animals or sell, transfer or relinquish the animals within 30 days. If necessary, any euthanasia would have to be performed by a licensed veterinarian or other qualified person.

AB 241 authorizes a peace officer, humane officer or animal control officer to take possession of any animal kept in violation.

The Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council and the American Kennel Club continue to oppose the bill.

PIJAC said the “anti-pet bill” does nothing to advance animal welfare. Instead, “it will limit the availability of healthy well-socialized pet puppies from reputable breeders. Because the number of dogs permitted under this bill is completely arbitrary, proponents are advocating for the lowest limit they believe will be adopted in law. Next year, they can come back and seek to limit it further.”

The AKC argues that the quality of a breeder is not determined by the number of animals he or she has, but by the care the animals receive. “This legislation will not improve the lives of cats and dogs, will negatively impact responsible breeders and may result in animals being euthanized or relinquished to shelters. Concentrating animal control efforts on dogs whose behavior demonstrates that they are a problem for the community would be a much better use of taxpayer funds.”

 Give us your opinion on
California Intact Animal Cap Bill Gets Second Reading With Amendments
Submit a Comment
Reader Comments
Arguable on both sides
Pat, Omaha, NE
Posted: 8/27/2009 7:50:34 AM
interesting
D, Indy, IN
Posted: 8/26/2009 7:03:35 PM
Good news.
Ed, Brooklyn, NY
Posted: 8/26/2009 5:52:13 PM
First off - I AM NOT A BREEDER. I do not feel it right to sent an arbitary limit on the amount of animals - it should be concerned with the quality of life and care these animals receive. A person could have only 5 pets, but their conditions could be horrific. Another person could own 55 animals, and they could all be well cared for and thriving. I definitely do not believe in putting a healthy animals to sleep just because it's owner owns too many animals according to this bill. Euthanasia should only be done in cases where the animal is already dying, in pain, and there is nothing that can be done for the animal. Euthanizing a healthy animals SHOULD BE A CRIME AND THAT SHOULD BE PROSECUTED!!!!
Sheryl, Casa Grande, AZ
Posted: 8/26/2009 5:48:03 PM
View Current Comments

Name:
Address:
City:
State:
Zip Code:
Email:

Kittens USA
Buy Now
Cats USA
Buy Now
Cat Fancy
Buy Now
 



Sponsored by:


Hi my name's Buddy-I am 4 yrs old today 11/21 !!

Visit the Photo Gallery to
cast your vote!